Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Beyond pleasurable and meaningful: Psychologically rich entertainment experiences.

Dominique S Wirz, Allison Eden, Ezgi Ulusoy, Morgan E Ellithorpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominique S WirzAmsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-8506
Allison EdenDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0846-2739
Ezgi UlusoyDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-1784
Morgan E EllithorpeDepartment of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0317-9267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entertainment experiences have been conceptualized as hedonic (pleasurable) or eudaimonic (meaningful), mirroring the hedonic and eudaimonic components of psychological well-being. However, psychologists have proposed a third component of well-being: psychological richness, which is characterized by variety, novelty, and interest. In this paper we explore the role of psychological richness in film and television entertainment experiences. Two studies, an experience sampling study (n = 28) and a survey (students in the US, n = 247 and general population in Germany, n = 289) show the prevalence of experience of psychological richness during media use and its positive relationship with well-being. A replication with a different scale (n = 291) demonstrates that psychologically rich entertainment experiences may have been previously been conflated by some measures of eudaimonic entertainment. Incorporating psychologically rich entertainment experiences as a third addition to hedonic and eudaimonic experiences can increase the intervention potential of media used to enhance well-being.

Indexed as

PleasureAdolescentAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion PicturesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelevisionUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39913401
PMCPMC11801586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.