SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2025
Remote workers' life quality and stress during COVID-19: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telework-related health outcomes in Japan and globally: Implications for avatar-based work standards.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2026Review
- How is the mental health of teachers faring? A 10-year follow-up study of depressive symptoms and job dissatisfaction in the CONSTANCES cohort.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic led to the adoption of a different working approach: "The remote working." Evidence about the association of remote working with stress outcomes and life quality is lacking. This systematic review provides an overview of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on remote-workers' stress and life quality. We conducted systematic literature searches in databases including Pubmed, Scopus and Web of science, from September 2020 to September 2023. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review highlighted possible predictors (work-family conflict or a condition of social isolation) associated with improvement or worsening of quality of life and stress. The results highlighted the association between stress and family difficulties (β: -0.02, P-value <0.05), isolation during the first (β: -0.22, P-value <0.05) and second pandemic waves (β: -0.40, P-value <0.05) or due to the advancing age of workers (β:0.19, P-value <0.05) and (β: -0.05, P-value <0.05), furthermore some job categories presented greater stress such as teachers (16.94 ± 5.46). Conversely, remote working positively affected life quality, enhancing factors such as creativity (Average Variance Extracted, AVE: 0.41, R2: 0.17) and self-efficacy (AVE: 0.60, R2: 0.36). Future research should focus more on the relationship between work and family and on interventions that counteract social isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.