Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913389›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025

Do patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy benefit from off-pump coronary bypass surgery? (From the KROK registry).

Kinga Kosiorowska, Marek Jasiński, Roman Przybylski, Marek Deja, Jan Rogowski, Witold Gerber, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Romuald Cichoń, Marek Cisowski, Wojciech Pawliszak and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kinga KosiorowskaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2768-7362
Marek JasińskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Roman PrzybylskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Marek DejaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Jan RogowskiDepartment of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Witold GerberDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, American Heart of Poland, Bielsko-Biała, Poland.
Jerzy PacholewiczDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Romuald CichońDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, MEDINET Heart Center Ltd, Wroclaw, Poland.
Marek CisowskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Wojciech PawliszakDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Paweł BugajskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, J. Strus Hospital, Poznan, Poland.
Michał KrejcaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Tomasz HirnleDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Bartłomiej PerekDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Zdzisław TobotaDepartment of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Bohdan MaruszewskiDepartment of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz HrapkowiczDepartment of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
KROK Investigators

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who had a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤35%.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database, encompassing patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Poland between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: on-pump and off-pump. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality following surgical revascularization.

resultsA total of 9920 patients were included, with 3116 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The median follow-up period was 4 years. The off-pump group was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (6.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.002) and fewer perioperative complications. However, long-term survival analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant advantage for on-pump group at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.047).

conclusionsOff-pump provides short-term benefits, including reduced early mortality and fewer complications compared to on-pump technique. However, these advantages do not translate into improved long-term survival, where on-pump demonstrates a slight benefit. The choice between off-pump and on-pump technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery Bypass, Off-PumpMyocardial IschemiaAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeischaemic cardiomyopathyleft ventricle dysfunctionoff-pump coronary artery bypass graftingsurgical revascularization

Identifiers

PMID39913389
PMCPMC11890277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.