Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913379›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Hybrid and/or mixed infection by pig and human Ascaris in a Guarani indigenous village in southern Brazil.

Veridiana Lenartovicz Boeira, Renata Coltro Bezagio, Marina Silva de Carvalho, Rinaldo Ferreira Gandra, Ana Paula de Abreu, Cristiano Lara Massara, Cristiane Maria Colli, Max Jean de Ornelas Toledo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Veridiana Lenartovicz BoeiraPostgraduate Program in Biological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Renata Coltro BezagioPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Marina Silva de CarvalhoPharmacy Course, State University of Western Paraná, Cascavel, Brazil.
Rinaldo Ferreira GandraPharmacy Course, State University of Western Paraná, Cascavel, Brazil.
Ana Paula de AbreuPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Cristiano Lara MassaraHelminthology Laboratory, René Rachou Institute, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Cristiane Maria ColliFederal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
Max Jean de Ornelas ToledoPostgraduate Program in Biological Sciences, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6314-8668

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Científico (CNPq)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAscaris lumbricoides and Ascaris suum are nematode parasites that infect millions of people and pigs worldwide, respectively. Reports of cross-infection and hybridization between the two species has stimulated molecular epidemiological studies of the Ascaris genus. In this study, we evaluated the dynamics of Ascaris transmission between Guarani indigenous schoolchildren, pigs, and the environment of a village in the state of Paraná, southern Brazil. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsParasitological and molecular analyses of fecal samples from humans and pigs, and soil samples from the village were carried out. Eggs of Ascaris spp. were observed in 8.4% (7/83) of human samples, 44.4% (8/18) of pig samples, and 8.9% (6/68) of soil samples. PCR amplification of the ITS-1 locus of the rDNA gene in samples that were positive in the parasitological examination revealed mixed infection and/or hybrids of the two species, A. lumbricoides and A. suum, in human and swine hosts. The soil, which was contaminated by both human and swine feces, also contained eggs of the two Ascaris species and hybrids, thus constituting a source of Ascaris infection for both hosts. DNA from A. lumbricoides and A. suum, individually, was detected in samples from humans and pigs, respectively, and the soil, while DNA from hybrid and/or Ascaris spp. was detected in samples from both hosts and the soil. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study confirm the necessity of a One Health approach with the correct disposal of both human and animal feces to control the spread of human and swine ascariasis.

Indexed as

AscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesAscaris suumCoinfectionSwine DiseasesAdolescentAnimalsAscarisBrazilChildDNA, HelminthDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFecesFemaleHumansHybridization, GeneticDNA, HelminthDNA, Ribosomal SpacerSoil

Identifiers

PMID39913379
PMCPMC11801532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.