Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913370›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

FoldX force field revisited, an improved version.

Javier Delgado, Raul Reche, Damiano Cianferoni, Gabriele Orlando, Rob van der Kant, Frederic Rousseau, Joost Schymkowitz, Luis Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Javier DelgadoCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-5445
Raul RecheCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Damiano CianferoniCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Gabriele OrlandoSwitch Laboratory, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5935-5258
Rob van der KantSwitch Laboratory, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Frederic RousseauSwitch Laboratory, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9189-7399
Joost SchymkowitzSwitch Laboratory, VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Luis SerranoCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-1392

Funding

European Research CouncilEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 101020135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe FoldX force field was originally validated with a database of 1000 mutants at a time when there were few high-resolution structures. Here, we have manually curated a database of 5556 mutants affecting protein stability, resulting in 2484 highly confident mutations denominated FoldX stability dataset (FSD), represented in non-redundant X-ray structures with <2.5 Å resolution, not involving duplicates, metals, or prosthetic groups. Using this database, we have created a new version of the FoldX force field by introducing pi stacking, pH dependency for all charged residues, improving aromatic-aromatic interactions, modifying the Ncap contribution and α-helix dipole, recalibrating the side-chain entropy of methionine, adjusting the H-bond parameters, and modifying the solvation contribution of tryptophan and others.

resultsThese changes have led to significant improvements for the prediction of specific mutants involving the above residues/interactions and a statistically significant increase of FoldX predictions, as well as for the majority of the 20 aa. Removing all training sets data from FSD [Validation FoldX Stability Dataset (VFSD) dataset] resulted in improved predictions from R = 0.693 (RMSE = 1.277 kcal/mol) to R = 0.706 (RMSE = 1.252 kcal/mol) when compared with the previously released version. FoldX achieves 95% accuracy considering an error of ±0.85 kcal/mol in prediction and an area under the curve = 0.78 for the VFSD, predicting the sign of the energy change upon mutation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FoldX versions 4.1 and 5.1 are freely available for academics at https://foldxsuite.crg.eu/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsSoftwareDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularMutationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProtein StabilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID39913370
PMCPMC11879241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.