ArticlePloS one2025
Influences of footstrike patterns and overground conditions on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during running: Statistical parametric mapping analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of various static calibration postures on knee mechanics during locomotor tasks using statistical parametric mapping analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The impact of midsole hardness on joint angles and plantar loading during running at multiple running velocities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated lower extremity biomechanics when running on different surfaces among runners with different footstrike patterns. Thirty rearfoot strikers (RFSs) and non-rearfoot strikers (nRFSs) ran at 3.3 m/s on a specially designed indoor track covered with three surfaces: artificial grass, synthetic rubber, and concrete. A motion capture system with ten cameras combined a force plate was used to collect marker trajectory and ground reaction force (GRF) during the running stance phase. A two-way analysis of variance with statistical parametric mapping was employed to evaluate differences in the biomechanics of the lower extremities between footstrike patterns and among running surfaces. The nRFSs exhibited significantly greater ankle inversion angles and increased inversion and internal rotation moments at midstance compared to the RFSs. Conversely, the RFSs demonstrated significantly greater knee abduction moments in late stance. Running on stiffer surfaces was associated with greater vertical GRF in late stance, as well as increased knee and hip extension moments during midstance. Furthermore, running on stiffer surfaces was associated with increased knee abduction moments, hip abduction moments, and hip external rotation moments during late stance. These findings suggested that nRFSs endure more ankle loads, while RFSs face increased knee loads. However, regardless of the footstrike pattern, runners may benefit from selecting softer surfaces to reduce the risk of injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.