ReviewPLOS global public health2025
Comparing apples with apples: A proposed taxonomy for "Community Health Workers" and other front-line health workers for international comparisons.
Review in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Understanding influences of care-seeking behaviours for diarrhoeal illnesses: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of community health workforce governance in federal Nepal.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Bridging work: Community health workers' role as a continuum of building, guiding, sustaining and transforming the path to health equity.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2026Article
- Article
- Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health worker programs on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries (2015-2024): A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Community health worker denominations: a global review through the case of French Guiana.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- Correction: Comparing apples with apples: A proposed taxonomy for "Community Health Workers" and other front-line health workers for international comparisons.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Economic evaluations of community health worker programs focussed on neglected tropical diseases in low- and middle-income countries (2015-2024): A scoping literature review.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Bridging communities, prevention, and heart health: U.S. strategies for CHW cardiovascular training and integration.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a taxonomy for Community Health Workers (CHWs) and others engaged in front-line community health activities, encompassing formally-employed workers extending government primary health care (PHC) service delivery as well as a range of other actors with roles at the nexus of government PHC and communities. The taxonomy is grounded in current definitions from the World Health Organization and the International Labor Organization, and proposes some refinements for future iterations of guidance from these agencies. The designation, "Community Health Worker" is currently used to cover a broad range of roles. Furthermore, there are programs engaging workers or community members in roles closely adjacent to those generally recognized as CHWs that use other designations, not commonly included under the rubric of "CHW". This potentially confusing range of roles and nomenclature leads at times to over-generalizations, applying insights and principles relevant for one type of worker or community member that are not necessarily relevant for another. It also leads to a failure to consider occupational groups not commonly thought of as CHWs-but engaged in PHC service delivery at the most peripheral level-in community-based-PHC planning and management arrangements. Building on ILO and WHO classifications and standards, a further clarification of terms and a taxonomy is proposed, with the intention of contributing to clearer communication and shared understanding and, ultimately, sounder community health policy, program planning, and implementation; and more substantial progress towards Universal Health Coverage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.