Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913331›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Scaling Graph Neural Networks to Large Proteins.

Justin Airas, Bin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin AirasDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5045-9926
Bin ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-7503

Funding

Probing and Perturbing Transcriptional Condensates with Multiscale Modeling and Deep LearningR35GM133580 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Bin Zhang · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph neural network (GNN) architectures have emerged as promising force field models, exhibiting high accuracy in predicting complex energies and forces based on atomic identities and Cartesian coordinates. To expand the applicability of GNNs, and machine learning force fields more broadly, optimizing their computational efficiency is critical, especially for large biomolecular systems in classical molecular dynamics simulations. In this study, we address key challenges in existing GNN benchmarks by introducing a dataset, DISPEF, which comprises large, biologically relevant proteins. DISPEF includes 207,454 proteins with sizes up to 12,499 atoms and features diverse chemical environments, spanning folded and disordered regions. The implicit solvation free energies, used as training targets, represent a particularly challenging case due to their many-body nature, providing a stringent test for evaluating the expressiveness of machine learning models. We benchmark the performance of seven GNNs on DISPEF, emphasizing the importance of directly accounting for long-range interactions to enhance model transferability. Additionally, we present a novel multiscale architecture, termed Schake, which delivers transferable and computationally efficient energy and force predictions for large proteins. Our findings offer valuable insights and tools for advancing GNNs in protein modeling applications.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsGraph Neural NetworksMachine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39913331
PMCPMC11904306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.