Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913259›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effects of dietary supplementation with linseed oil, Ascophyllum nodosum or treated A. nodosum on animal performance, gaseous emissions, ruminal fermentation and microbiota, and meat quality in growing dairy-beef bulls.

Emily Roskam, David A Kenny, Alan K Kelly, Maria Hayes, Nikola Palevich, Paul H Maclean, Vincent O'Flaherty, Ambarish Biswas, Sinéad M Waters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily RoskamAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Meath, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-6206
David A KennyAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Meath, Ireland.
Alan K KellyUCD school of Agricultural and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Maria HayesFood BioSciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Ireland.
Nikola PalevichAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-2452
Paul H MacleanAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8898-8276
Vincent O'FlahertySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ambarish BiswasAgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Sinéad M WatersSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oils high in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and seaweeds containing phlorotannins have potential anti-methanogenic effects in ruminants. This study assessed the potential of dietary supplementation with linseed oil, Ascophyllum nodosum or treated A. nodosum in an intensive beef cattle feeding system on animal performance, gaseous emissions, ruminal fermentation and microbiota, and muscle fatty acid profiles. Seventy-two dairy-beef bulls (380 kg; 11 mo of age) were randomly allocated to one of four dietary treatments (n = 18) for a 70-d period. The diet consisted of a 60:40 grass silage:concentrate ratio. Silage was offered daily (0900 hours) and concentrates were offered twice daily (0800 and 1500 hours). Dietary treatments were incorporated into the concentrate portion of the diet as follows; 1) CON (no supplementation), 2) LSO (linseed oil), 3) SW (A. nodosum), and 4) EX (A. nodosum extract), included to target 0%, 4%, 2%, and 2% of dry matter intake (DMI), respectively. The concentrates were formulated to be isonitrogenous across the 4 treatment groups. Total DMI (American Calan Inc., Northwood, NH), average daily gain (ADG), gain:feed, and enteric emissions (GreenFeed; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) were measured for the 70-d supplementation period. Total DMI (P = 0.17), ADG (P = 0.28), gain:feed (P = 0.68), and total tract digestibility (P = 0.70) did not differ across treatments. Daily methane production (P < 0.001) for CON, LSO, SW, and EX was 210, 170, 202, and 193 g/d, respectively, resulting in reductions of 19% and 8% for LSO and EX, respectively, relative to CON. Ruminal fermentation parameters show that LSO was the only dietary treatment to increase propionate (P = 0.09) and decrease butyrate (P = 0.04) concentrations relative to CON. Microbial analyses showed LSO supplementation increased and decreased relative abundances of fungal genera Buwchfawromyces and Piromyces, respectively, while altering relative abundances of the bacterial genera Muribaculaceae, Bacteroidales RF16 group and Bacterium F082. Additionally, LSO increased linolenic acid (P < 0.001) and n-3 PUFA (P < 0.001) concentration of the longissimus dorsi muscle compared to CON, SW, and EX. In conclusion, LSO was the most effective dietary supplementation strategy compared to CON, EX, and SW, whereby it reduced methane emissions, modified ruminal fermentation and microbial profiles, and enhanced beneficial muscle PUFA concentration, without impacting animal performance.

Indexed as

AscophyllumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLinseed OilMeatAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsFermentationGasesMaleRumenGasesLinseed Oilenvironmentalgreenhouse gas emissionslipidmethaneruminantsseaweed

Identifiers

PMID39913259
PMCPMC11956689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.