Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913256›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Satisfaction with health care among people with differences of sex development (DSD) in Germany.

Maike Schnoor, Andreas Heidenreich, Martina Jürgensen, Ulla Döhnert, Olaf Hiort, Alexander Katalinic, DSDCare study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas Heidenreich
Martina Jürgensen
Ulla Döhnert
Alexander Katalinic
DSDCare study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Individuals with a difference of sex development (DSD) face complex medical and psychosocial challenges, which can make it difficult to provide care tailored to their needs and in line with guidelines. The DSDCare project in Germany regularly evaluates the quality of care for people with DSD, focusing on patient satisfaction as a key indicator of care quality. Design: Nationwide, longitudinal, multicentre observational study in Germany, including people with DSD. Methods: Since May 2021, ten specialised DSD centres have been recruiting individuals with DSD and collecting patient-related medical data in a registry. Participants and legal guardians, in the case of minors, complete a questionnaire about satisfaction with care using the Y/CHC-SUN questionnaire. Both medical and self-reported data were merged and analysed descriptively. Results: Between May 2021 and December 2023, 141 adults and 232 parents completed the questionnaire. Of these, 81.9% of adults and 86.4% of parents reported being 'very' or 'extremely satisfied' with their healthcare. Satisfaction scores in the dimensions 'doctor's behaviour' and 'patient-centred care' were very high for both adults and parents, while the dimensions 'clinical environment', 'diagnosis/information' and 'coordination' were rated slightly lower. Some participants expressed unmet needs for DSD training, psychological counselling, contact with self-advocacy groups and, in the case of adults, nutritional counselling. Conclusion: Individuals with DSD treated at specialised DSD centres in Germany report high satisfaction with their care. The next step is to ensure that all individuals with DSD have access to a specialised centre to where their care needs can be met. Significance statement: Several international guidelines provide recommendations for the management of individuals with DSD. Previous studies examining the evolution of management practices in response to these guidelines have concluded that while some are being implemented, others are not, with notable regional variations. In addition, there is limited understanding of satisfaction with care from the perspective of adults and, in particular, from parents of children with DSD, which is a key indicator of quality of care. Consequently, our study focused on patient-related outcomes and experiences, as well as on identifying unmet needs to enhance the quality of care for individuals with DSD in Germany.

Indexed as

differences of sex developmentDSDpatient reported outcomepatient satisfactionquality of care

Identifiers

PMID39913256
PMCPMC11883859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.