Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913139›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Outcomes of Glaucoma Referrals in Adults Aged 18 to 40 Years.

Tanner Frediani, Kristy Yoo, Austin Cho, Jennifer Louie, Kent Nguyen, Grace Richter, John Shan, Benjamin Y Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanner FredianiKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Kristy YooKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Austin ChoKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Jennifer LouieVision Essentials Regional Office, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles.
Kent NguyenRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Grace RichterLos Angeles General Medical Center, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles.
John ShanPanorama City Medical Center, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles.
Benjamin Y XuRoski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Funding

Ophthalmic Therapeutics Engineering CoreP30EY029220 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Mahnaz Shahidi · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
Clinical Evaluation and Risk Stratification of Angle Closure Disease Using Quantitative OCTR01EY035677 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Benjamin Y. Xu · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY029220NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While early detection of glaucoma is vital to prevent irreversible vision loss, there are sparse data on the effectiveness of glaucoma referrals and methods to establish evidence-based referral guidelines in large, diverse populations. Objective: To assess the prevalence and risk factors for diagnosed glaucoma and loss to follow-up among adult patients aged 18 to 40 years after a new diagnosis of referable glaucoma (ie, with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 to 40 years presenting to Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large managed health care system, for first-time eye examinations between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018. Data analysis occurred between September 2022 and August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was glaucoma diagnosed within 2 years of the first eye examination. The secondary outcome was the loss to follow-up, defined as failure to receive a glaucoma evaluation with visual field or optical coherence tomography testing within 2 years. Results: The cohort included 292 453 patients aged 18 to 40 years who underwent first-time eye evaluations (mean [SD] age, 29.8 [6.4] years). Among 12 050 identified patients with referable glaucoma (52.3% female), 6827 (56.7%) completed glaucoma evaluations, of whom 563 (8.2%) were diagnosed with glaucoma (344 [61.1%] with open angle, 28 [5.0%] with angle closure, 84 [14.9%] with secondary glaucoma, and 107 [19.0%] with unspecified glaucoma). On multivariable analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 [95% CI, 1.07-2.27]), higher intraocular pressure (IOP) (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.15-1.23] per 1 mm Hg), and greater cup-disc ratio (CDR) (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.34-1.75] per 0.1 unit) were associated with greater odds of glaucoma. Dichotomized age, IOP, and CDR models stratified 51 of 1613 patients (3.2%) into the low-risk group and 202 of 1477 patients (13.7%) into the high-risk group. Being younger than 32 years and having an IOP less than 18 mm Hg and a CDR less than 0.7 yielded a negative predictive value of 98.2% for a glaucoma diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the diagnostic yield of glaucoma referrals was low among adults aged 18 to 40 years with first-time eye examinations. A simple risk-stratification strategy could help identify individuals with low and high risks of developing glaucoma, and adoption of evidence-based risk stratification and referral guidelines by health care systems and clinicians could improve equity of glaucoma care and use of eye-care resources.

Indexed as

GlaucomaReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansLost to Follow-UpMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39913139
PMCPMC11803476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.