ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
Biplanar or Monoplanar Prostate Biopsy: Should Transrectal and Transperineal Ap-proaches be Combined for Prostate Cancer Detection?
Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The New Visual Erection Hardness Score is the Topic Highligheted in this Issue of International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Pain Perception During Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Under Local An-esthesia: a Prospective Analysis of a Multi-ethnic and Diverse Cohort.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Prostate Biopsy Once Again Is a Hot Topic in This Issue of the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging, particularly because standard biopsy techniques do not routinely include anterior zone, leading to potential missed diagnoses in this region. This study evaluates the accuracy and safety of biplanar stereotactic biopsy for diagnosing anterior clinically significant PCa (csPCa). MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter propensity score matching analysis, data from 256 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 128 in the biplanar group (transrectal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy) and 128 in the monoplanar group (transperineal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy). PCa detection rates, lesion locations, csPCa, clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa), and complication incidences were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors influencing biopsy outcomes.
resultsNo significant differences were observed in overall PCa detection, ciPCa, posterior lesions, or postoperative complications between biplanar and monoplanar groups. The biplanar group demonstrated a higher detection rate for anterior csPCa (P=0.025). The overall International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP GG) distributions for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3 to 5 were not significantly different. Logistic regression identified age and PSA levels as independent predictors of higher detection rates, while univariable analysis showed that prostate volume had a significantly smaller effect on PCa detection rates in the biplanar group compared to the monoplanar group. Postoperative complications showed no statistically significant differences.
conclusionsIn conclusion, biplanar stereotactic biopsy was superior to monoplanar biopsy in detecting anterior csPCa. Both methods demonstrated no significant differences in overall PCa detection rates and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.