Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913089›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Urogenital Tuberculosis: A Narrative Review and recommendations for diagnosis and treatment.

André Avarese Figueiredo, José Carlos Truzzi, Augusto Azevedo Barreto, Eduardo Carvalho Siqueira, Marcos Lucon, Marcos Broglio, Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch, Antônio Peixoto de Lucena Cunha, Bruno Vilalva Mestrinho, Leandro Koifman and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

André Avarese FigueiredoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF - Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.
José Carlos TruzziEscola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - (EPM/UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Augusto Azevedo BarretoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF - Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.
Eduardo Carvalho SiqueiraFaculdade de Medicina Presidente Antônio Carlos, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil.
Marcos LuconFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcos BroglioDisciplina de Urologia da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Karin Marise Jaeger AnzolchDivisão de Urologia do Hospital Moinho de Vento de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Antônio Peixoto de Lucena CunhaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Bruno Vilalva MestrinhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Luziânia, Luziânia, GO, Brasil.
Leandro KoifmanHospital Municipal Souza Aguiar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
José de BessaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana - UEFS, Feira de Santana, BA, Brasil.
Luciano Alves FavoritoUnidade de Pesquisa Uroginital, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeto review the more relevant aspects of urogenital tuberculosis (UGT) and make recommendations about the diagnosis and treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsa literature review was conducted in the Pubmed, Embase and Scielo databases in search of studies on UGT in the past 60 years. A narrative review was performed concerning six topics of UGT diagnosis and treatment. Recommendations were made supported on degrees of evidence according to the modified GRADE system.

resultsUGT suspicion occurs in persistent hematuria or pollakiuria with sterile pyuria; stenosis and/or thickening of the urinary tract; or chronic prostatitis or epididymitis. Urinary bacteriological tests have low sensitivity, and a negative test does not rule out UGT diagnosis. In ureteral stenosis, a double-J catheter or nephrostomy should be used early (up to 1 month) during pharmacological treatment and in single less than 2 cm stenosis endoscopic treatment may be attempted. Bladder augmentation with ileum, sigmoid or ileocecal segments should be performed when the contracted bladder capacity is less than 100 mL. Spontaneous voiding occurs in most patients after bladder augmentation.

conclusionThe diagnosis of UGT depends on a high degree of suspicion based on non-specific symptoms and radiological findings. Urinary bacteriological tests have low sensitivity, but even in the absence of diagnostic confirmation, treatment can be carried out through a combination of drugs for a period of six months. In the presence of ureteral stenosis or contracted bladder, complex but well stablished reconstruction procedures are necessary.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis, UrogenitalHumansReview [Publication Type]TuberculosisTuberculosis, Urogenital

Identifiers

PMID39913089
PMCPMC11884631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.