ArticleJournal of applied genetics2025
Scope for a threshold animal model for genetic evaluation for hip dysplasia.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of the Hip Status of Golden Retrievers in Brazil-A Study of Health and Genetic Improvement.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hip dysplasia (HD) is a major welfare problem, and in the present work, we investigated a sample of Bernese Mountain Dog breed bred in Brazil to estimate the genetic parameters for HD and to determine the best model for the estimation of breeding values (EBV) of dogs. The pedigree database consisted of 2218 dogs, of which 1202 had the hip phenotype available, corresponding to the X-ray (XR) classification according to the Fédération Cynologique Intenationale. Comparisons were made between seven different threshold models considering the HD phenotype with five classifications (reports from A to E) according to the XR (PHD1) and the binary phenotype with joints considered normal (report A) and abnormal (reports B to E) (PHD2). The threshold animal model was used to estimate the variance components and predict the genetic values. Fourteen models were evaluated, seven using variable PHD1 and another seven considering variable PHD2. Evaluated fixed effects were sex, birth year, or country of birth, which differed between models. The best fit model for the PHD1 phenotype estimated a heritability value of 0.30, while the best fit model for PHD2 estimated a value of 0.36. EBVs ranged from - 0.736 to 1.040 for PHD1 and from - 1.050 to 1.459 for PHD2, showing a wide diversity in the genetic merit of dogs. Approximately 40% of the animals had an EBV accuracy value greater than 50%. Considering the best two fit models for the tested phenotypes, we opted for the indication and use of the model working with PHD1, because of the direct correspondence of the PHD1 phenotype with the five possibilities of hip XR reports, once this facilitates understanding by both veterinarians and breeders. This model is used as the only fixed effect of the birth year. The present study is one of the first on canine genetic improvement approach in Brazil, and our results indicate the importance and potential of the use of EBV in the selection of sires for the improvement of HD in the national breeding of the breed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39913054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.