Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913027›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2025

Same Day Discharge After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

Faris Najdawi, Jonathan Alcantar, David I Lee, Mohammed Shahait, Ryan W Dobbs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Faris NajdawiDivision of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jonathan AlcantarDivision of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA.
David I LeeDepartment of Urology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Mohammed ShahaitDepartment of Urology, Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, UAE.
Ryan W DobbsDivision of Urology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA. ryanwdobbs@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review evaluates the current landscape of same-day discharge (SDD) following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP), highlighting perioperative management strategies and proposing future research directions. RECENT

findingsRARP has been shown to improve perioperative outcomes including reduced blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared to open radical prostatectomy. Recently, the question of the feasibility of SDD for RARP has been proposed, aiming to reduce postoperative complications, hospital-acquired infections, and healthcare costs. The advent of single-port robotic systems aims to further minimize postoperative morbidity. Recent literature has reported SDD for RARP is safe and feasible in appropriately selected patients, with postoperative outcomes, including complication and readmission rates, similar to inpatient RARP. Our findings show SDD can be safely implemented without compromising patient outcomes, as evidenced by similar complication, readmission, and emergency department visit rates compared to inpatient cohorts. Future research should be aimed to refining patient selection criteria, enhancing opioid-free anesthesia pathways, and exploring new surgical technologies to improve SDD outcomes.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresPatient DischargeProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayMalePostoperative ComplicationsAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.