ReviewHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Laparoscopic repair of parahiatal hernia: surgical techniques and literature reviews.
Review in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laparoscopic Repair of an Incarcerated Parahiatal Hernia with Gastric Necrosis: A Rare Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeParahiatal hernia (PHH) is a rare type of diaphragmatic hernia that protrudes through a defect adjacent to, but distinct from, the esophageal hiatus. Current literature on PHH is extremely limited. In this study, we present our experience with laparoscopic repair of PHH and provide a comprehensive review of existing literature.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed clinical data from eight patients diagnosed with PHH at Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, between October 2021 and March 2024. Collected data included patient demographics, hernia characteristics, and perioperative details. The primary outcomes assessed were the safety and feasibility of the procedure, along with postoperative complications such as pleural effusion, hemorrhage, fistula, and mesh infection.
resultsLaparoscopic surgery was successfully performed in all patients. Two patients underwent simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy. Concurrent hiatal hernia was diagnosed in two patients, while seven patients required esophageal hiatus repair due to an enlarged hiatus following PHH repair. The mean hernia ring width was 3.69 ± 1.22 cm. Mesh reinforcement was employed in six patients. The mean operative time was 205.63 ± 62.36 min, and the mean hospital stay was 7.75 ± 1.49 days. With a median follow-up of 11.5 (interquartile range: 7.75-29.5) months, no major complications, recurrences, or mortality were reported.
conclusionLaparoscopic repair of PHH is a safe and effective procedure. Nonetheless, the techniques for defect closure, hiatus repair, mesh placement, and fundoplication should be customized based on the individual patient's characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39913018What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.