ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
The total energy from X-ray electron density?
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThis approach to quantum crystallography ensures the satisfaction of three quantum conditions, namely, idempotency, hermiticity, and normalization of the one-body density matrix, simultaneously as the X-ray diffraction problem is solved to reproduce the observed structure factors. The variational theorem used to optimize energy will only hold true if the density matrices used for such purpose are N-representable. The point of N-representability is to ensure the mapping of a density matrix to an N-body antisymmetric wavefunction. The antisymmetry is consistent with the experimental indistinguishability of fermions. This article develops a procedure for the fast and accurate application of quantum crystallography to large systems while guaranteeing that the results are N-representable.
methodsFor large molecules, it is advantageous to have the one-body density matrix assembled from sub-matrices of fragments within a scheme known as the kernel energy method (KEM). KEM accounts for up to two-body interactions between all fragments and ignores higher order interactions, an approximation that proved accurate through extensive past numerical testing. Since this approach to quantum crystallography rests on a single-determinant description, an explicit form of the corresponding N-representable two-body density matrix, which is determined by its one-body counterpart, is also given along with its use to calculate the total energy. This approach can be applied to extract conceptual density functional theory properties, quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) properties, etc. from experimental structure factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39912981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.