ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
The importance of the posterior osteoligamentous complex of the lumbar spine: dogma changing biomechanical insights.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early MRI-Detected Interspinous Ligament Region Edema Is Associated With Delayed Pain Recovery and Persistent Low Back Pain After Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- PMMA-augmentation of the spinous process as an enhancing-protective measure against bone failure in "through the spinous process-vertebropexy".North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring full flexion of the spine, the paraspinal muscles are largely inactive. This suggests that passive structures like the posterior osteoligamentous complex (POLC), consisting of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments and the spinous processes, play a key role in spinal stability and protection of the spinal column. The POLC, however, is often resected or damaged during spinal decompression surgeries, whereas the biomechanical implications of this resection or damage are not yet fully understood.
methodsA stepwise reduction study was performed on three fresh frozen cadaveric torsi (aged 30-78 years) using a custom setup which only allows sagittal plane motion. After preloading and locking in full flexion, the posterior lumbar structures were gradually resected in the following order: Skin, fascia, musculature, facet joints, ligamentum flavum, posterior ligamentous complex, and posterior longitudinal ligaments. Load cells measured force increase on the fixation frame after each resection step.
resultsThe load increased sequentially with each resection, demonstrating load transfer from the passive structures onto the fixation frame. The POLC, including the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments at L2-L5, accounted for 69 - 74% of the measured passive load resistance in full flexion, representing the largest contribution. Facet joints with their capsules contributed 10-18%, while muscular contributions were negligible (< 2%).
conclusionThe experiment indicates that the POLC is the primary passive stabilizer of the fully flexed lumbar spine. Surgical resection of this structure can redistribute loads and increase stresses on remaining spinal tissues, potentially leading to spinal instability, accelerated degeneration, and poor clinical long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39912946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.