ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Impact of unilateral knee restraint on symmetry adaptation and double-support phase dynamic stability during split-belt walking.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The split-belt treadmill task is an effective tool for studying walking adaptation, particularly the symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters such as step length and double support time. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between symmetry adaptation of spatiotemporal parameters and dynamic stability during the double-support phase in split-belt walking. We hypothesized that restraining fast-side knee extension, which is necessary for step lengthening during adaptation, would decrease dynamic stability during the double-support phase. Ten able-bodied male participants performed split-belt walking tasks under three conditions: control, fast-side knee restraint, and slow-side knee restraint. Our findings revealed that slow-side knee restraint disrupted symmetry in double support time and significantly decreased stability on the fast side during the early and late adaptation phases. Contrary to our hypothesis, fast-side knee restraint did not have a statistically significant effect on dynamic stability or symmetry. These results suggest that decreased dynamic stability during the double-support phase, particularly due to limitations in the movement of the trailing leg, may hinder the adaptation process. This study highlights the importance of dynamic stability control during the double-support phase for successful walking adaptation. Future studies with larger sample sizes and varying speed conditions are recommended to generalize these findings and develop targeted interventions to improve walking adaptability and dynamic stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39912907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.