ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Evaluating post-treatment residual intracranial arteriovenous shunting: a comparison of arterial spin labeling MRI and digital subtraction angiography.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stroke-Mimic: An Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Revealed by New-Onset Seizures and Post-Ictal Deficit.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Simultaneous Multiparametric Estimation of AVM Hemodynamics Using MR Fingerprinting Arterial Spin-Labeling.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI in detecting residual arteriovenous (AV) shunting in treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and fistulas (AVFs).
methodsA retrospective institutional review identified 29 patients with DSA-confirmed AV shunt lesions treated via embolization (n = 17), stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2), surgical resection (n = 8), or combined embolization and surgical resection (n = 4), with corresponding baseline and post-treatment ASL and DSA studies. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed ASL images for residual AV shunting, with inter-rater agreement calculated. Disagreements were jointly reviewed to reach consensus. Sensitivity and specificity for using ASL to detect residual AV shunting were then determined using DSA as the gold standard reference.
resultsSeventeen patients with Spetzler-Martin grades II-V AVMs were included: 76.5% with supratentorial nidus, and 52.9% with prior hemorrhage. Twelve AVF patients were included, including eight dural, one vein of Galen, two perimedullary, and one cavernous-carotid fistula. Inter-rater agreement for presence of residual AV shunting was strong (93.5%, κ = 0.87). Two disagreements involved AVM patients after surgical resection. Sensitivity and specificity of ASL for detecting residual was 94% and 93%, respectively. Within the AVM group, both metrics reached 100%, while for AVFs, they both decreased to 83%, with one false positive and one false negative.
conclusionASL MRI is highly sensitive and specific for detection of residual AV shunting across a wide spectrum of AV shunt pathologies and treatment modalities. ASL can play an important role as a non-invasive adjunct to DSA, potentially reducing the frequency of DSA during the continuum of post-treatment care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.