ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
Generalized Coupled Matrix Tensor Factorization Method Based on Normalized Mutual Information for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Data Analysis.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Signal and Network Integrity: Evaluating BCG Artifact Removal Techniques in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complementary properties of both modalities can be exploited through the fusion of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Thus, a joint analysis of both modalities can be used in brain studies to estimate brain activity's shared and unshared components. This study introduces a comprehensive approach for jointly analyzing EEG and fMRI data using the advanced coupled matrix tensor factorization (ACMTF) method. The similarity of the components based on normalized mutual information (NMI) was defined to overcome the restrictive equality assumption of shared components in the common dimension of the ACMTF method. Because the mutual information (MI) measure can identify both linear and nonlinear relationships between the components, the proposed method can be viewed as a generalization of the ACMTF method; thus, it is called the generalized coupled matrix tensor factorization (GCMTF). The proposed GCMTF method was applied to simulated data, in which the components exhibited a nonlinear relationship. The results demonstrate that the average match score increased by 23.46% compared with the ACMTF model, even with different noise levels. Furthermore, applying this method to real data from an auditory oddball paradigm demonstrated that three shared components with frequency responses in the alpha and theta bands were identified. The proposed MI-based method cannot only extract shared components with any nonlinear or linear relationship but can also identify more active brain areas corresponding to an auditory oddball paradigm compared to ACMTF and other similar methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39912857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.