Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912817›Full record

Trial reportJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025

Pharmacist vs physician management of e-visit requests for COVID-19 medication: A randomized clinical trial.

Tracy A Lieu, E Margaret Warton, Andrew deLaunay, Stephanie Prausnitz, Milton Chan, Michelle R Mancha, Thao Huynh, Eric Smallberg, Charles Quesenberry, Kristine Lee and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06096863, which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06096863 no registry record found
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tracy A LieuThe Permanente Medical Group (TPMG), Pleasanton, CA.
E Margaret WartonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Pleasanton, CA.
Andrew deLaunayPharmacy Services, KPNC, Pleasanton, CA.
Stephanie PrausnitzDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Pleasanton, CA.
Milton ChanVirtual Care Team, TPMG, Pleasanton, CA.
Michelle R ManchaVirtual Care Team, TPMG, Pleasanton, CA.
Thao HuynhAdult and Family Medicine, TPMG, South Sacramento.
Eric SmallbergTPMG Consulting Services, Pleasanton, CA.
Charles QuesenberryDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Pleasanton, CA.
Kristine LeeThe Permanente Medical Group (TPMG), Pleasanton, CA.
Mary ReedDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Pleasanton, CA.
Permanente Medical Group Virtual Care Study Team

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic visits (e-visits), defined as structured asynchronous electronic messages between patients and clinicians requiring clinical decision-making, are being increasingly used to enhance access to outpatient health care services, but the primary care physicians who typically manage them face work overflow. Pharmacists have been proposed to manage e-visits that lead to prescription requests, but scant evidence exists about the effectiveness of this approach.

objectiveTo compare pharmacist management of structured asynchronous e-visit requests for COVID-19 medication with physician management regarding quality of care, timeliness, and patient care experience.

methodsThis cluster-randomized clinical trial included adults from 17 medical facilities of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who made e-visits requesting COVID-19 medication (nirmatrelvir-ritonavir) from October 9 to December 11, 2023. In the Pharmacist Care group, a regional team of pharmacists managed e-visits for COVID-19 medication; in the Physician Care group, pools of adult and family medicine physicians managed these visits. The primary outcome was whether a patient with 1 or more potential serious drug-drug interactions received counseling via an electronic secure message. Secondary outcomes included prescribing rates, time to the prescription, and patient perceptions of care quality.

resultsAmong the 1,753 eligible patients (mean age = 52.2 [SD = 15.9] years; 57.7% female), 642 received Pharmacist Care and 1,111 received Physician Care. The percentage of patients with a potential drug-drug interaction who were sent counseling messages by the clinician did not differ between the Pharmacist Care (76 of 79 [96.2%]) and Physician Care groups (193 of 201 [96.0%]) (risk difference [RD] = 0.18%; 95% CI = -4.8% to 5.2%). The pharmacist and physician groups had similar rates of prescribing (87.4% vs 84.4%; RD = 2.9; 95% CI = -0.4 to 6.3). Pharmacist Care compared with Physician Care had faster mean time from the initial e-visit submission to the resulting prescription (1.0 vs 2.5 hours; RD = -1.5; 95% CI = -1.9 to -1.2). Pharmacist Care took more clinician time per visit than Physician Care (10.7 vs 4.2 minutes), resulting in higher estimated cost ($11.40 vs $6.70). After the study period, the pharmacist team made protocol changes to improve workflow efficiency, and a follow-up analysis 12 months later found significant reductions in per-visit time (to 5.7 minutes) and estimated cost (to $6.03) under Pharmacist Care. Patient perceptions of care did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionsPharmacist care and physician care for patient e-visits for COVID-19 medication both yielded high quality of care, with no significant group differences. Evaluation of pharmacist care may be warranted for other e-visits designed to facilitate medication prescribing. CLINICAL TRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06096863.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPharmacistsRitonavirAdultAgedCaliforniaCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID39912817
PMCPMC11801361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.