Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912811›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025

Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.

Matthew G Bowles, Autumn D Zuckerman, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Mackenzie Ellis, Chelsea P Renfro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew G BowlesVanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Autumn D ZuckermanVanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Josh DeClercqDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Leena ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Mackenzie EllisLipscomb University College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN.
Chelsea P RenfroVanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) use step therapy requirements and formulary alternatives to reduce prescription spending. The clinical utility and ultimate therapy outcomes for patients participating in these programs is an area of needed research.

objectiveTo evaluate medication outcomes and time requirements to access therapy in patients required to use a step therapy or formulary alternative after being prescribed a specialty medication for psoriasis (PsO) or atopic dermatitis (AD).

methodsA single-center, retrospective review of data collected from electronic health records and the specialty pharmacy patient management system was conducted. Patients were included if they had a referral for a specialty medication by a dermatology provider for PsO or AD that was discontinued because of the payer/PBM requiring step therapy or formulary alternative use from January 2021 to June 2022. The primary outcome was the number of days from the time of patient referral for specialty medication until the second specialty medication referral. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients that failed step therapy or formulary alternative and were referred back to the specialty pharmacy as well as the number of patients not started on a specialty medication and the reason.

resultsThe included patients (N = 83) were predominantly White (75%) and female (61%) with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-61 years). 51% of patients had an indication of AD. 62 patients were required to use step therapy, and 21 were required to use a formulary alternative. Of the patients required to use step therapy, 37 (60%) had a second referral for a specialty medication because of failing step therapy requirements, with a median time to a second referral of 75 days (IQR = 27-135). The remaining 25 patients were not started on a specialty medication: 5 patients (8%) benefited from and remained on step therapy, 15 (24%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (5%) decided not to start step therapy, and 2 (3%) were referred for psoriatic arthritis evaluation. All patients required to use a formulary alternative initiated specialty medication with a median time from the initial referral to second referral of 3 days (IQR = 1-9 days).

conclusionsMost patients required to complete nonspecialty step therapy ultimately initiated specialty medications after a lengthy delay, demonstrating the potential impact of step therapy requirements on initiating clinically appropriate treatment for AD and PsO. Further research assessing the financial burden and clinical impact of requiring step therapy before specialty medications is warranted.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicDermatologic AgentsPsoriasisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesDermatologic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39912811
PMCPMC11852794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.