ArticleJournal of lower genital tract disease2025
Lichen Sclerosus in Cancer Patients.
Article in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize the association between cancer therapies and the development of lichen sclerosus (LS) in a case series of patients.
methodsA retrospective chart review was performed to screen for patients who were diagnosed with LS while undergoing cancer therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2003 and 2019. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with LS prior to starting cancer therapy. Clinical and treatment characteristics were analyzed.
resultsThe final study sample included 29 female patients who developed LS in the setting of systemic cancer therapy. Median time to LS onset after cancer therapy initiation was 420 days. Primary tumor types included breast (10, 34.5%), gynecologic (8, 27.6%), gastrointestinal (5, 17.2%), cutaneous (2, 6.9%), lung (2, 6.9%), and hematologic (2, 6.9%). Cancer therapy regimens included hormonal therapy (10, 34.5%), chemoradiation (7, 24.1%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (7, 24.1%), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (3, 10.3%), local radiation (1, 3.4%), and allogeneic stem cell transplant (1, 3.4%). Across all patients, the mean number of treatments for LS was 2.8. Twenty-three (79.3%) patients received the first-line therapy of ultrapotent topical steroids, but 16 (69.6%) required additional topical and systemic treatment. Limitations include retrospective design and referral bias.
conclusionsBreast cancer was the most common primary tumor among patients in this study. The most common cancer therapy regimen was hormonal therapy. Most patients required an escalation in therapy to manage their LS. For patients undergoing cancer treatment, concomitant LS management can present unique challenges due to the biological mechanism of some anticancer therapies and the pathophysiology of LS. There is limited data to guide treatment of LS for this population. Some of the patients included in this analysis had progression of LS and recurrence of cancer while undergoing management of both conditions, necessitating close follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.