ArticleAdvanced biology2025
Generation of Advanced Blood-Brain Barrier Spheroids Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Brain Capillary Endothelial-Like Cells.
Article in Advanced biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoscopic analysis of tight junction organization in in vitro blood-brain barrier models.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- From Polyphenols to Prodrugs: Bridging the Blood-Brain Barrier with Nanomedicine and Neurotherapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Generation of Advanced Blood-Brain Barrier Spheroids Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Brain Capillary Endothelial-Like Cells.Advanced biology · 2025Article
- CHIASMA: Advancing chemicals and materials safety and sustainability assessments through innovative integration of in vitro and in silico (new approach) methodologies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extensively studied blood-brain barrier (BBB) in-vitro models are established on 2D cell culture inserts. However, they do not accurately represent 3D in-vivo microenvironments due to lack of direct neurovascular unit cellular contacts. Here, the establishment and characterization of a self-assembled 3D BBB spheroid model using human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived brain capillary endothelial-like cells (iBCECs) in combination with primary human astrocytes (ACs) and pericytes (PCs) are reported. This investigation compares 3D spheroids with 2D mono-cultured iBCECs derived from two different hiPSC lines and two differentiation strategies. It is observed that spheroid properties vary depending on the differentiation strategy or type of hiPSC line applied for model generation. However, spheroids demonstrate in-vivo like tight junction ultrastructure and, in comparison to 2D models, higher transcript expression of BBB specific genes. Furthermore, they possess characteristic barrier integrity, barrier functionality, and protein expression. It is inferred that hiPSC-derived BBB spheroids hold a strong potential as a reliable future BBB in-vitro test system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.