ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2025
Same same but different? How blood and lymphatic vessels induce cell contact inhibition.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanobiology of solid tumor vasculature: implications for tumor progression.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Blocking glutamine transport normalizes lymphatic vessels in hypoxic environments by attenuating glycolysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- An update on schistosomicide and tumoricide in the future: arachidonic acid.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
- The nucleocytoplasmic translocation of HINT1 regulates the maturation of cell density.Life science alliance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endothelial cells (ECs) migrate, sprout, and proliferate in response to (lymph)angiogenic mitogens, such as vascular endothelial growth factors. When ECs reach high confluency and encounter spatial confinement, they establish mature cell-cell junctions, reduce proliferation, and enter a quiescent state through a process known as contact inhibition. However, EC quiescence is modulated not only by spatial confinement but also by other mechano-environmental factors, including blood or lymph flow and extracellular matrix properties. Changes in physical forces and intracellular signaling can disrupt contact inhibition, resulting in aberrant proliferation and vascular dysfunction. Therefore, it is critical to understand the mechanisms by which endothelial cells regulate contact inhibition. While contact inhibition has been well studied in blood endothelial cells (BECs), its regulation in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) remains largely unexplored. Here, we review the current knowledge on extrinsic stimuli and intrinsic molecular pathways that govern endothelial contact inhibition and highlight nuanced differences between BECs and LECs. Furthermore, we provide perspectives for future research on lymphatic contact inhibition. A deeper understanding of the BEC and LEC-specific pathways underlying contact inhibition may enable targeted modulation of this process in blood or lymphatic vessels with relevance to lymphatic or blood vascular-specific disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.