Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912703›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Exploring Men's Experiences of Engagement With General Practice: A Qualitative Study.

Ruth Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth MursaUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-7181
Christopher PattersonUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-8811
Gemma McErleanUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6496-5678
Elizabeth HalcombUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-986X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs males are less engaged with healthcare than females, they often present when a condition is more advanced, reducing the potential for early intervention. Little is known about why men are less engaged and what influences them to be more proactive. This study sought to explore men's experiences of engagement with general practice.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study was nested within a sequential mixed-methods project. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 17 male staff and volunteers of the New South Wales Rural Fire Service about their experiences, attitudes, and preferences for general practice engagement. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data.

resultsFive sub-themes emerged about men's engagement with general practice. "Reasons for engagement" revealed motivations for seeking healthcare. "Seeking validation" explained how social influences impacted engagement. The "importance of relationships" highlighted the value men place on trust with the healthcare provider/team, and how this impacts engagement. "Interpersonal communication" addressed preferences for direct and authentic communication. Finally, "barriers to engagement" revealed the challenges in accessing care.

conclusionsAwareness of the barriers and facilitators to men's engagement with general practice can inform strategies to improve care. This study suggests that health professionals play a crucial role in building therapeutic relationships with men and partnering with them in their healthcare journey to improve engagement and health outcomes.

Indexed as

General PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNew South WalesQualitative Researchgeneral practicehealthcare engagementmalesmenprimary care

Identifiers

PMID39912703
PMCPMC11803725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.