Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912701›Full record

ArticleInternational health2025

Co-designing the FOotpaths foR Adolescent MAternal Mental HeAlth (FOR MAMA) intervention for pregnant teens in Malawi.

Wezi Mhango, Daniel Michelson, Darya Gaysina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wezi MhangoSchool of Psychology, Pevensey 1 Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-2154
Daniel MichelsonSchool of Psychology, Pevensey 1 Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.
Darya GaysinaSchool of Psychology, Pevensey 1 Building, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.

Funding

Commonwealth Scholarship CommissionUniversity of Sussex
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to gain insights into stakeholders' priorities and preferences for a scalable intervention for common mental problems among perinatal adolescents in Malawi.

methodsParticipatory stakeholder workshops (n=9) were conducted iteratively according to the principles of the Person-Based Approach. Three stakeholder groups were recruited from one urban and one rural primary health centre in Zomba district, Malawi: perinatal adolescents (n=10), their family members (n=8) and healthcare workers (n=10). Framework analysis was conducted using intervention descriptors from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist.

resultsParticipants emphasized the need for information on causes and symptoms of common mental problems and for developing coping strategies: a) those focused on external stressors-problem-solving, financial literacy and interpersonal skills-and b) emotion-focused approach behaviours-behavioural activation, relaxation and anger management. There was a strong preference for healthcare workers as intervention providers. Participants agreed on a brief antenatal intervention delivered weekly using both group and individual formats. There were positive views on both self-help and guided formats. All stakeholder groups felt there was a need for follow-up to ensure that adolescents correctly engaged with the intervention material.

conclusionsFindings informed the design of a brief multicomponent guided intervention for adolescents in the antenatal period.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthPregnancy in AdolescenceAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalawiPregnancyStakeholder Participationadolescentsco-designinterventionLMICsmental healthperinatal

Identifiers

PMID39912701
PMCPMC12212213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.