Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912580›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Advancing Privacy-Preserving Health Care Analytics and Implementation of the Personal Health Train: Federated Deep Learning Study.

Ananya Choudhury, Leroy Volmer, Frank Martin, Rianne Fijten, Leonard Wee, Andre Dekker, Johan van Soest

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05775068 (ARtificial Intelligence for Gross Tumour vOlume Segmentation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05775068 unknown statusnot on this map

ARtificial Intelligence for Gross Tumour vOlume Segmentation

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht Radiation OncologyRan2021 to 2024Enrolled2,000ConditionsLung CancerArmsRadiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Technology Review: The Hidden Influence of AI in Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI Privacy and Security in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ananya Choudhury *GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-8165
Leroy Volmer *GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4978-4024
Frank MartinNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-1569
Rianne FijtenGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-6317
Leonard WeeGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9055
Andre DekkerGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-7996
Johan van SoestGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-0330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid advancement of deep learning in health care presents significant opportunities for automating complex medical tasks and improving clinical workflows. However, widespread adoption is impeded by data privacy concerns and the necessity for large, diverse datasets across multiple institutions. Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a viable solution, enabling collaborative artificial intelligence model development without sharing individual patient data. To effectively implement FL in health care, robust and secure infrastructures are essential. Developing such federated deep learning frameworks is crucial to harnessing the full potential of artificial intelligence while ensuring patient data privacy and regulatory compliance.

objectiveThe objective is to introduce an innovative FL infrastructure called the Personal Health Train (PHT) that includes the procedural, technical, and governance components needed to implement FL on real-world health care data, including training deep learning neural networks. The study aims to apply this federated deep learning infrastructure to the use case of gross tumor volume segmentation on chest computed tomography images of patients with lung cancer and present the results from a proof-of-concept experiment.

methodsThe PHT framework addresses the challenges of data privacy when sharing data, by keeping data close to the source and instead bringing the analysis to the data. Technologically, PHT requires 3 interdependent components: "tracks" (protected communication channels), "trains" (containerized software apps), and "stations" (institutional data repositories), which are supported by the open source "Vantage6" software. The study applies this federated deep learning infrastructure to the use case of gross tumor volume segmentation on chest computed tomography images of patients with lung cancer, with the introduction of an additional component called the secure aggregation server, where the model averaging is done in a trusted and inaccessible environment.

resultsWe demonstrated the feasibility of executing deep learning algorithms in a federated manner using PHT and presented the results from a proof-of-concept study. The infrastructure linked 12 hospitals across 8 nations, covering 4 continents, demonstrating the scalability and global reach of the proposed approach. During the execution and training of the deep learning algorithm, no data were shared outside the hospital.

conclusionsThe findings of the proof-of-concept study, as well as the implications and limitations of the infrastructure and the results, are discussed. The application of federated deep learning to unstructured medical imaging data, facilitated by the PHT framework and Vantage6 platform, represents a significant advancement in the field. The proposed infrastructure addresses the challenges of data privacy and enables collaborative model development, paving the way for the widespread adoption of deep learning-based tools in the medical domain and beyond. The introduction of the secure aggregation server implied that data leakage problems in FL can be prevented by careful design decisions of the infrastructure.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05775068; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05775068.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerdata privacydata protectiondeep learningfederated learning infrastructuregross tumor volume segmentationimaginglung canceroncologyprivacy-preserving technologyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39912580
PMCPMC11843053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.