ArticleCancer medicine2025
Merging of the Fukushima Health Management Survey With the National and Local Cancer Registry to Refine the Detection of Thyroid Cancer Cases After the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A prospective cohort study of the factors associated with recurrence in young patients with thyroid cancer.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfter the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in 2011, the Fukushima Health Management Survey (FHMS) was implemented in Fukushima Prefecture to promote long-term health care. The FHMS included thyroid ultrasound examination (TUE) for individuals aged ≤ 18 years, including fetuses at the time of the accident. However, the FHMS may not have captured all cases of thyroid cancer because it only followed up with examinees. To address this gap, we aimed to merge individual-level information from the FHMS with national and local cancer registries (CRs) to determine the limitations of the FHMS and CRs in capturing thyroid cancer cases.
methodsThe FHMS-eligible residents' information was supplemented by merging and cross-validating the FHMS and CR data using the Fukushima Prefectural Cancer Registry (FPCR), 2008-2015, and the National Cancer Registry (NCR), 2016-2018. For analysis, registered cases were classified into three groups: registered in both the CR and FHMS, or only in the CRs, or only in the FHMS. The characteristics of each case were evaluated in each database.
resultsIn the FHMS, 212 thyroid cancer cases were identified through 2018, with another 42 cases identified in the CRs. Of the 176 thyroid cancer cases registered until 2015, 28 (15.9%) were identified in the FHMS only and 13 (7.4%) in the FPCR only. Of the 78 additional cases identified since 2016, 29 (37.2%) were identified in the NCR only and 6 (7.7%) in the FHMS only. This indicates that the NCR captured the cases more efficiently than the FPCR.
conclusionMerging data from the FHMS and CRs at the individual level is necessary to capture thyroid cancer cases more accurately after the 2011 nuclear accident.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.