ReviewJournal of biosciences2025
Glutamate metabolism disruption in Johanson-Blizzard syndrome: Insights from
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Johanson-Blizzard syndrome (JBS) is a complex autosomal recessive disorder that manifests through a spectrum of symptoms, with deficiencies in the ubiquitin-protein ligase E3 component N-recognin 1 (UBR-1) at its genetic core. Despite its clinical significance, the molecular intricacies of UBR-1's role in JBS remain largely elusive, presenting a formidable challenge in devising targeted treatments. The nematode
Indexed as
Identifiers
39912399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.