Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912248›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Device Failures and Adverse Events Associated With Rhinolaryngoscopes: Analysis of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Shao-Hsuan Chang, Daishi Chen, Chi-Sheng Chen, Dong Zhou, Lung-Kun Yeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shao-Hsuan Chang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4136-7928
Daishi Chen *Department of Otolaryngology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6143-5732
Chi-Sheng ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-0217
Dong ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-4867
Lung-Kun YehDepartment of Ophthalmology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St, Guishan Dist, Taoyuan, 333423, Taiwan, 886 3-328-1200 ext 8666, 886 3-328-7998.ORCID 0000-0003-1925-2059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rhinolaryngoscopes are one of the most widely used tools by otolaryngologists and speech-language pathologists in current clinical practice. However, there is limited data on adverse events associated with or caused by the use of rhinolaryngoscopes. Objective: In this study, we used the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database with the aim of providing insights that may assist otolaryngologists in better understanding the limitations of these devices and selecting appropriate procedures for their specific clinical setting. Methods: We characterized complications associated with the postmarket use of rhinolaryngoscope devices from the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE database from 2016 through 2023. Results: A total of 2591 reports were identified, including 2534 device malfunctions, 56 injuries, and 1 death, from 2016 through 2023. The most common device problem with rhinolaryngoscopes was breakage (n=1058 reports, 40.8%), followed by fluid leaks (n=632 reports, 24.4%). The third most common problem was poor image quality (n=467 reports, 18%). Other device issues included contamination or device reprocessing problems (n=127 reports, 4.9%), material deformation or wear (n=125 reports, 4.8%), and device detachment (n=73 reports, 2.8%). Of the 63 reported adverse events, the most common patient-related adverse event was hemorrhage or bleeding, accounting for 18 reports, with the root causes including material deformation or wear, breakage, wrinkled rubber, or improper operation. Conclusions: Our study offers valuable insights for endoscopists and manufacturers to recognize potential issues and adverse events associated with the use of rhinolaryngoscopes. It emphasizes the need for improving device reliability, training, and procedural protocols to enhance patient safety during diagnostic procedures.

Indexed as

Equipment FailureLaryngoscopesDatabases, FactualHumansProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationadverse eventdevice malfunctionManufacturer and User Facility Device ExperienceMAUDEmedical devicerhinolaryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID39912248
PMCPMC11822329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.