Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912127›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Leveraging historical trials to predict Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat breeding programs.

Charlotte Brault, Emily J Conley, Andrew J Green, Karl D Glover, Jason P Cook, Harsimardeep S Gill, Andrew C Read, Jason D Fiedler, James A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte BraultDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-4236
Emily J ConleyDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Andrew J GreenDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Karl D GloverAgronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Jason P CookPlant Sciences and Plant Pathology Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Harsimardeep S GillDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-6912
Andrew C ReadUSDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Jason D FiedlerUSDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-4484
James A AndersonDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-6517

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 3060-21000-046-000DU.S Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative FY22-SP-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a fungal disease posing a major threat to wheat production. Plant breeding that leverages genotyping is an effective method to improve the genetic resistance of cultivars. Started in 1995, the uniform regional scab nursery (URSN) consists of germplasm from several public breeding programs in the Northern US region. Its main objective is to showcase new sources of resistance and enable germplasm exchange among the cooperators; however, the data from the URSN have not been studied. Phenotypic and genotypic data from this nursery were gathered, as well as from two current breeding programs in the US Midwest. Genomic prediction on eight traits related to FHB and agronomic traits was applied, and the effects of statistical method, marker density, training set size, genetic structure, and genetic architecture of the trait were studied. Using the URSN population, reproducing kernel Hilbert space was the best method in various prediction settings, with an average accuracy of 0.63, marker density could be as low as 500 without decreasing the prediction accuracy, and training set optimization was useful for two traits. Furthermore, genotypic values were predicted in breeding programs using the URSN population as a training set with various prediction scenarios. Predicting unrelated populations led to a significant decrease in accuracy but with encouraging values for some traits and populations. Ultimately, when progressively decreasing the number of lines from breeding populations in the training set, the advantage of adding the URSN population was more pronounced, with an increase in accuracy up to 0.19.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceFusariumPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesTriticumGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID39912127
PMCPMC11800066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.