Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912115›Full record

ArticleUrology case reports2025

Duplicate bladder exstrophy in a female infant: A case report.

Yalda Obaidy, Ajmal Sherzad, Dunya Moghul

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Urology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yalda ObaidyDepartment of Surgery, Ataturk Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Ajmal SherzadDepartment of Surgery, Ataturk Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Dunya MoghulMcGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplicate bladder exstrophy, a rare variant of the bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex, was diagnosed in a 5-month-old female infant presenting with a 4 × 4 cm lower abdominal mass. Physical examination revealed absent umbilical scar, wide symphysis pubis, and anteriorly displaced genitalia and anus. Imaging ruled out classic bladder exstrophy and vesicoureteral reflux. Surgical exploration confirmed a suprapubic exstrophic mucosal plaque without communication to a functional bladder. Management involved excision of the exstrophic plaque and primary abdominal wall closure. Post-operative course was normal intravenous pyelogram findings. This case emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis and tailored surgical approach for rare bladder exstrophy variants.

Indexed as

1. Duplicate bladder exstrophy2. Congenital anomaly3. Suprapubic exstrophic plaque4. Surgical management5. Pediatric urology

Identifiers

PMID39912115
PMCPMC11795109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.