Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912096›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2025

Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.

Matthew Stewart, Jessica L Geiger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew StewartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Primary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jessica L GeigerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has shifted with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Traditional treatment methods have been met with limited efficacy and durability. Recently, ICIs such as pembrolizumab and cemiplimab have emerged as effective alternatives for treating advanced cSCC. Pembrolizumab, approved by the FDA in 2020 for recurrent or metastatic cSCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiation, has shown promising results in clinical trials. Immunotherapy is also being explored in neoadjuvant settings, with ongoing trials evaluating its potential to improve outcomes for high-risk patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. However, patient selection remains crucial, with the tumor microenvironment playing a key role in predicting treatment response. With many patients achieving a complete response, immunotherapy presents a promising option; however, ongoing research is needed to refine its use, especially in immunocompromised or high-risk patients.

Indexed as

cSCCcutaneous squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapypembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39912096
PMCPMC11796446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.