ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Does the Proximal Humerus Nail with 2 Distal Screws Provide Sufficient Rotational Stability?
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of fluoroscopic versus electromagnetic distal locking in humeral shaft osteosynthesis using intramedullary nail: a retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: Proximal humerus nails, frequently used for managing proximal humerus fractures, significantly enhance rotational stability and reinforce fractured fragments. Few research exists regarding the optimal number and positioning of distal screws. This study aimed to assess the stability of diverse screw configurations and scrutinize screw distribution and bone stress via finite element analysis. Methods: The humerus intramedullary nail (Humerus Interlocking Nail System; TDM) underwent assessment using finite element analysis applied to a humerus model. Three groups were established based on varying distal screw numbers and locations: all 3 distal locking holes were used in group 1; 2 screws (dynamic hole and proximal static hole) in group 2, and 2 screws (dynamic hole and distal static hole) in group 3. Finite element analysis computed stress distribution within the implant and bone for each group. A 1-mm fracture gap was simulated at the surgical neck, and stress distributions were analyzed in both normal and osteoporotic bone models. Results: Using two screws did not compromise rotational stability. Stress distribution analysis revealed stability across all groups without reaching failure strength. Group 3 exhibited a minor rise in component 11 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 1 faces in the 1-axis. direction) and component 22 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 2 faces in the 2-axis direction) stress, remaining below failure strength thresholds. Group 1 exhibited the lowest von Mises stress in the nail and screws, while groups 2 and 3 did not reach failure strength levels. Findings remained consistent in the osteoporotic model. Conclusions: All 3 groups demonstrated rotational stability concerning stress distribution, indicating that using 2 screws for distal fixation does not adversely affect stability. This suggests the potential for saving surgical time and reducing radiation exposure without compromising stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.