ArticleCureus2025
Effects of Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation and Skull Pin Holder Fixation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Pooled it
- Effect of intratracheal dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine at various times prior to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: a randomized clinical trial.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (L&I) and the fixation of skull-pin head-holders are associated with various sympathetic stimuli leading to hemodynamic changes. These changes may lead to myocardial ischemia, brain edema, an increase in intracranial pressure, or intracranial hemorrhage. Many drugs have been used in different combinations to attenuate the sympathetic responses to L&I and skull-pin insertion. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine with intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine (IV) in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to L&I and the fixation of skull-pin holders in patients undergoing craniotomy. Material and methods This randomized-controlled, double-blind study was conducted on 120 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18 to 70 years, undergoing elective craniotomy and requiring skull-pin insertion. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group DIV: IV dexmedetomidine 0.50 µg/kg given over 40 minutes before induction. Group DIN: Undiluted dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg given as IN drops 40 minutes before induction. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were noted at baseline and at predetermined intervals after L&I and skull-pin fixation. Sedation scores were assessed preoperatively at baseline and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes after study drug administration. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0. Results Both IN and IV dexmedetomidine successfully attenuated the stress responses to L&I and skull-pin fixation without significant hypertension or tachycardia. All hemodynamic parameters (MAP, SBP, DBP, HR) were maintained within normal limits (±20% of baseline) before and during L&I and after skull-pin fixation in both groups. However, the preoperative Ramsay sedation scale score was significantly higher in the IV than in the IN group at 10, 20, and 30 minutes of drug administration (p<0.05). The incidence of hypoxia and bradycardia was also higher in the IV than in the IN group. Nausea, vomiting, or respiratory depression were not observed in any patient. Conclusion Both IN and IV dexmedetomidine are effective in blunting the hemodynamic responses to L&I and skull-pin fixation. However, IN dexmedetomidine is a better alternative to IV dexmedetomidine as it causes less sedation and fewer side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.