Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39912023›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of the Most Popular Educational Content in Arabic Available Through Four Social Media Applications in Saudi Arabia That Explains Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity.

Omar B Alammari, Omar Odeh, Rakan Alotaibi, Mohammed Zamzam, Abdullah S Alghamdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omar B AlammariSurgery/Ophthalmology, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Omar OdehGeneral Practice, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rakan AlotaibiInternal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammed ZamzamOrthopaedics, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah S AlghamdiOrthopaedic Surgery, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background With the growing availability and popularity of social media, it is essential to assess the quality and accuracy of the information available about health conditions. This study aims to evaluate the quality of Arabic content related to clubfoot on four social media platforms: YouTube, TikTok, X (formerly known as Twitter), and Instagram. Additionally, it seeks to understand how caregivers of children with clubfoot can utilize social media. Methods This study involved a qualitative analysis conducted over six months, focusing on the Arabic clubfoot community on social media. Data collection included comments, posts, and short clips, which were recorded in a Google Sheet. The study was approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), and all procedures adhered to the guidelines set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki. Data analysis utilized descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis, with results presented in tables. Results The study identified a total of 14 videos and posts on TikTok, nine posts on X (formerly Twitter), 18 videos and posts on YouTube, and 10 posts on Instagram. Notably, TikTok video 2 garnered the highest engagement, receiving 76,000 views and 561 likes. The top-performing post on X achieved 140 likes. YouTube video 3 received 31,239 views along with 479 likes, while Instagram post 7 attracted the highest engagement, with 76 likes and 44 comments. Conclusion Overall, the quality of Arabic content regarding clubfoot on YouTube, TikTok, X, and Instagram was found to be generally poor. Healthcare organizations should consider utilizing social media platforms to promote awareness and education about clubfoot treatment and management.

Indexed as

claw footclubfootinstagramsocial mediatik tokx (formerly twitter)youtube videos

Identifiers

PMID39912023
PMCPMC11798615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.