ReviewIntegrative medicine research2025
Effectiveness and safety of combined treatment with herbal medicines and palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review, and meta-analysis.
Review in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese medicine for non-small cell lung carcinoma: An evidence mapping.Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
- Acupuncture for cancer-related insomnia: An evidence mapping.Integrative medicine research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with its treatment complicated by challenges such as high recurrence rates, severe side effects, and limited effectiveness of current therapies. Herbal medicine (HM) has emerged as an adjunct to palliative chemotherapy (PC), potentially improving tumor response and reducing side effects. This study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HM in palliative therapy for inoperable stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ AGC patients. Methods: Databases were searched until August 2023, encompassing 10 electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and ScienceON. The inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) combining herbal medicine with palliative therapy for patients with AGC. Primary outcomes assessed were tumor response rates, overall survival, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and patients' quality of life (QoL). Results: In our analysis of 101 RCTs comparing PC alone to PC combined with HM, the meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvements in overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), survival rates, as well as a reduction in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and an enhancement in quality of life (QoL) for patients receiving HM in combination with PC ( Conclusion: The combination of HM with PC significantly enhances tumor response and survival rates while reducing overall adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and improving quality of life (QoL) in patients with stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ AGC. HMs not only improve the efficacy of PC but also help alleviate side effects, including myelosuppression, digestive symptoms, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, liver and renal injuries, and neurotoxicity.Protocol registration: PROSPERO, CRD 42022354133.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.