Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911975›Full record

ArticleSkin appendage disorders2025

Drug-Induced Hair Loss: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Events Reporting System Database.

Rachel C Hill, Steven D Zeldin, Shari R Lipner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel C HillWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Steven D ZeldinWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Shari R LipnerDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Drug-induced hair loss is one of several causes of hair loss commonly seen in clinical practice, and it is often a daunting task to determine a potential culprit drug when a patient is taking numerous medications. Our objective was to identify drugs responsible for hair loss, using the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database, a compilation of drug-related adverse events (AEs). Methods: Using the FAERS database, we queried all domestic reports with the reaction term "alopecia" listed as an AE in patients ≥18 years old from April 1, 1968, to September 29, 2023. Using descriptive statistics, individual agents were grouped by drug class. Results: We analyzed a total of 39,346 hair loss AE reports related to a single agent. Immunomodulatory agents and monoclonal antibodies represented the highest proportion of AE reports for alopecia, followed by hair loss drugs, contraceptives, and antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics. Conclusion: In sum, we showed that immunomodulatory agents and monoclonal antibodies, hair loss drugs, including minoxidil and finasteride, contraceptives, kinase inhibitors, and anti-TNF drugs are most frequently associated with hair loss AEs in the FAERS database. Because many of these drugs are not prescribed primarily for dermatologic indications, our study provides guidance for dermatologists in identifying common medications associated with alopecia.

Indexed as

AlopeciaContraceptivesHair lossImmunomodulatory agentTumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39911975
PMCPMC11793883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.