ArticleFree neuropathology2025
Preservation of cellular structure via immersion fixation in brain banking.
Article in Free neuropathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ donation and brain preservation after assisted dying: case report and considerations for a potential pathway.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Expansion microscopy of banked brain tissue.Free neuropathology · 2026Article
- Mechanical perfusion in brain banking: methods of assessment and relationship to the postmortem interval.Free neuropathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immersing the brain in a solution containing formaldehyde is a commonly used method for preserving the structure of human brain tissue in brain banking. However, there are questions about the quality of preservation using this method, as formaldehyde takes a relatively long period of time to penetrate a large organ such as the human brain. As a result, there is a critical need to determine whether immersion fixation is an adequate initial preservation method. To address this, we present exploratory histologic findings from our brain bank following the immersion fixation of hemi-sectioned brain specimens under refrigeration. Using light microscopy, we found that there was no significant change in the size of pericellular or perivascular rarefaction areas based on the postmortem interval (PMI) or on the progression from the outer (frontal cortex) to the inner (striatum) brain regions. Additionally, we did not identify any significant number of ghost cells - a state of late-stage cellular necrosis - in the light micrographs analyzed. Using transmission electron microscopy of tissue from the frontal cortex, we found that synapses could still be visualized, but there was vacuolization and variable degrees of myelin disbanding identified. Using serial section transmission electron microscopy, we found that identified synapses could be traced from one section to the next. Using serial block face scanning electron microscopy, we also found that myelinated axons on 2D images can be traced with high fidelity from one image to the next, even at PMIs of up to 27 hours. Collectively, our data corroborate previous findings that immersion fixation is effective for prevention of cellular necrosis and for visualizing many ultrastructural features in at least the surface areas of the brain. However, how structural preservation quality should best be assessed in brain banking is an open question that depends on the intended research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.