ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Advances in tissue engineering of peripheral nerve and tissue innervation - a systematic review.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle reprogramming in peripheral nerve injury: mechanisms, therapeutic roles, and complication management.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Vascularized Nerve Grafts: Current Concepts, Indications, and Future Perspectives.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Injectable Poloxamer and Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Sustained Co-Delivery of Dexamethasone and Lidocaine Ameliorates Neuropathic Pain.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Review
- Intranasal delivery systems for traumatic brain injury: Advancements and perspectives.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although various options are available to treat injured organs and peripheral nerves, none is without limitations. Auto- and allografts are the first choice of treatment, but tissue survival or functionality is not guaranteed due to often limited vascular and neural networks. In response, tissue-engineered solutions have been developed, yet clinical translations is rare. In this study, a systematic review was performed on tissue-engineered advancements for peripheral nerves and tissues, to aid future developments in bridging the gap toward the clinic by identifying high-potential solutions and unexplored areas. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus until November 9, 2023. Search terms involved "tissue engineering," "guided," "tissue scaffold," and "tissue graft," together with "innervation" and "reinnervation." Original in vivo or in vitro studies meeting the inclusion criteria (tissue-engineered peripheral nerve/innervation of tissue) and no exclusion criteria (no full text available; written in foreign language; nonoriginal article; tissue-engineering of central nervous system; publication before 2012; insufficient study quality or reproducibility) were assessed. A total of 68 out of 3626 original studies were included. Data extraction was based on disease model, cell origin and host species, biomaterial nature and composition, and external stimuli of biological, chemical or physical origin. Although tissue engineering is still in its infancy, explored innervation strategies of today were highlighted with respect to biomaterials, cell types, and external stimuli. The findings emphasize that natural biomaterials, pre-seeding with autologous cell sources, and solutions for reproductive organs are beneficial for future research. Natural biomaterials possess important cues required for cell-material interaction and closely resemble native tissue in terms of biomechanical, geometrical and chemical composition. Autologous cells induce biomaterial functionalization. As these solutions pose no risk of immunorejection and have demonstrated good outcomes, they are most likely to fulfill the clinical demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.