Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911896›Full record

ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2024

Phytochemicals from

Hilwan Yuda Teruna, Rohimatul Khodijah, Neni Frimayanti, Rudi Hendra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hilwan Yuda TerunaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Rohimatul KhodijahDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Neni FrimayantiSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Farmasi Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Rudi HendraDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Experimental approach: The secondary metabolites were isolated using a bioassay-guided approach. The aerial part was macerated in methanol and the crude methanol was partitioned with organic solvents to obtain n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and water extracts. The ethyl acetate extract was purified using chromatography procedures, yielding six chemicals, and their structures were determined using spectroscopy. The antibacterial activity of the compounds was evaluated. Findings/Results: Six secondary phytochemical metabolites were identified including naringin (1), catechin (2), quercetin (3), rutin (4), kaempferol (5), and mangiferin (6). The absolute configurations of compounds 1 and 2 were ascertained using electronic circular dichroism as 2S for naringin and 2R, 3S for catechin. The compounds exhibited antibacterial activity against several pathogenic bacteria, with MIC and MBC values ranging from 7.8 to 250 μg/mL. Computational investigations of these compounds revealed a substantial affinity for bacterial receptors' active and allosteric regions. Furthermore, rutin exhibited the capacity to reduce the activity of β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III, enhancing its antibacterial effectiveness. Conclusion and implications: The

Indexed as

1HNJ3IL7PDB ID: 2ZDQPhenolic antibacterial compoundsPolypodiaceaePyrrosia longifoliaSecondary metabolites isolation

Identifiers

PMID39911896
PMCPMC11792715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.