ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2024
Enhancement effect of urea toward electroporation-mediated plasmid transfection efficiency in the HEK-293 cell line.
Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Intracellular delivery is crucial in biological and medical studies. Although many molecular tools have been created for cell-based gene therapies, it remains challenging to introduce external molecules into cells. As one of the most popular non-viral transfection methods, electroporation induces transient pores in the cell membrane by applying an external electric field. Unsatisfactory transfection efficiency and low cell viability are the major drawbacks of electroporation. To overcome these issues, the current study investigated the effect of urea on electroporation-mediated transfection efficiency. Experimental approach: Three voltages of electroporation, including 100, 120, and 140 V, and 3 concentrations of urea buffer, including 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% W/V, were considered as variables in this study. The HEK-293 cell line was used for transfection, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was evaluated using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Findings/Results: The results showed that the combination of electroporation and urea increased electroporation efficacy, but the effect depended on voltage and urea concentration. When different concentrations of urea were added to HEK-293 cells at a voltage of 100 V, the number of cells transfected by pEGFP-N1 increased (from 12.3 ± 0.2% in untreated cells to 17.35 ± 0.55%, 23.3 ± 0.3%, and 14 ± 0.1% at urea concentrations of 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% W/V, respectively). The electroporation buffer containing 0.5% W/V urea showed the highest EGFP expression (23.3 ± 0.3%) and high cell viability (over 90%). Conclusion and implications: This research offers a new perspective for improving gene transfection efficiency once electroporation is utilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.