Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911888›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Evolution under intensive industrial breeding: skull size and shape comparison between historic and modern pig lineages.

A Haruda, A Evin, F Steinheimer, R Schafberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A HarudaCentral Natural Science Collections, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-3954
A EvinISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-1649
F SteinheimerCentral Natural Science Collections, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-731X
R SchafbergCentral Natural Science Collections, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-5414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestication and subsequent human-induced selection has enhanced profound changes in animal morphology. On modern domestic pigs, those transformations encompass not only overall increases in body size but also modifications in skull morphology. While skull morphological differences between modern domestic pigs and wild boar are relatively well-documented, less understood is the variation and underlying mechanisms associated with intensive breeding. In this study, we investigated the rate and direction of phenotypic change of skull morphology using a unique dataset that includes two lineages of German domestic pig that were subjected to similar intensive industrial selection pressures throughout the twentieth century, alongside contemporaneous populations of German wild boar. Size and shape variation of 135 specimens was quantified through geometric morphometrics, with 82 three-dimensional landmarks. We find expected differences in skull shape between wild and domestic pigs, but also convergence between the two domestic lineages through the century of directed breeding, despite population segregation. Our results suggest that cranial morphologies have rapidly responded to selection pressure that is independent of genetic isolation. This also suggests that pig morphotypes quickly reflect human agency and impact upon domestic animal phenotypes, revealing a pathway to investigate early human breeding activity in ancient and historical contexts.

Indexed as

breedingconvergencegeometric morphometricsmorphologySus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID39911888
PMCPMC11793964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.