Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911841›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Improving doublet cell removal efficiency through multiple algorithm runs.

Yong She, Chaoye Wang, Qi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yong SheState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Chaoye WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Qi ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doublets are a key confounding factor in the analysis of scRNA-seq data, as they can interfere with differential expression analysis and disrupt developmental trajectories. However, due to the randomness of the algorithms, most doublet removal methods still leave a certain proportion of doublets after application. In this study, we proposed a multi-round doublet removal (MRDR) strategy, that ran the algorithm in cycles multiple times to effectively reduce randomness while enhancing the effectiveness of doublet removal. We evaluated the MRDR strategy in 14 real-world datasets, 29 barcoded scRNA-seq datasets, and 106 synthetic datasets with four popular doublet detection tools, including DoubletFinder, cxds, bcds, and hybrid. We found that in real-world datasets, the DoubletFinder had a better performance in MRDR strategy compared to a single removal of doublets and the recall rate improved by 50 % for two rounds of doublet removal compared to one round, and the performance of the other three doublet algorithms improved the ROC by about 0.04. In barcoded scRNA-seq datasets, we found that using cxds for two rounds of doublet removal yielded the best results. Subsequently, in simulated datasets, we proved that the multi-round removal strategy was more effective in removing doublets than a single removal, with cxds showing the best results when applied twice, and the ROC of the four methods during the two rounds of removal improved by at least 0.05 compared to single removal. Finally, compared to running the algorithm once, we found that the MRDR strategy was more beneficial for differential gene expression analysis and cell trajectory inference when using default analysis parameters. Overall, we proved that the MRDR strategy was more effective in removing doublets and advantageous for downstream analyses, and the strategy could be incorporated into the standard analysis pipeline for scRNA-seq experiments and recommend using cxds to remove doublets through two rounds of algorithm iteration.

Indexed as

Doublet removalMulti-round doublet removal strategySingle-cell RNA sequencingSynthetic dataset

Identifiers

PMID39911841
PMCPMC11794957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.