Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911832›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease.

Haohang Su, Shengwei Xiao, Zhiqing Liang, Tianrong Xun, Jinfang Zhang, Xixiao Yang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. ASM case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cost calculation model of introducing Upadacitinib and Risankizumab for adult ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haohang SuDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Shengwei XiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhiqing LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Tianrong XunDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Jinfang ZhangCancer Center, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Xixiao YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method. Methods: Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance. Results: We identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.

Indexed as

bayesian network meta-analysisbiologic agentsCrohn’s diseaseefficacyGRADEsafety

Identifiers

PMID39911832
PMCPMC11794990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.