Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911827›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Brief summary of the regulatory frameworks of regenerative medicine therapies.

Jinah Yoon, Sukhyang Lee, Min Jung Kim, Jung-Hyun Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Central Nervous System Demyelinating Diseases: Clinical Evidence, Therapeutic Niches, and Translational Boundaries.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Hypoimmune platforms: from rejection to immune evasion and regulatory implications.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinah YoonDepartment of Law, Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sukhyang LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Min Jung KimCollege of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hyun KimCollege of Pharmacy, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancements in regenerative medicine (RM), including cell therapies, gene therapies, tissue-engineered products, and combined RM advanced therapies, require the development of regulatory frameworks. The global landscape of regulatory frameworks presents diverse approaches to the oversight of these therapies, posing challenges in the global application of RM. This paper reviews the regulatory frameworks for RM across the United States, European Union, Japan, Canada, Australia, Taiwan, and South Korea and compares the unique features of the respective legislations.

Indexed as

cell therapygene therapylegislationregenerative medicineregulatory authorities

Identifiers

PMID39911827
PMCPMC11794276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.