Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911822›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Natural killer cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy.

Shahryar Khoshtinat Nikkhoi, Geng Li, Arash Hatefi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. More tools to uncover cancer cells.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [Current status of research on the impairment of natural killer cell function caused by hepatitis B virus infection].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahryar Khoshtinat Nikkhoi *Department of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Geng Li *Department of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Arash HatefiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Rutgers Optimizes Innovation (ROI) ProgramU01HL150852 · NHLBI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI LIBUTTI, STEVEN K., PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2022
$4.4M
Stem Cell-based Platform for Targeted Enzyme/Prodrug Therapy of Recurrent Ovarian CancerR01CA251438 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI HATEFI, ARASH · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA251438NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL150852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article explores the rapidly evolving field of bi-, tri-, and multi-specific NK cell engagers (NKCEs), highlighting their potential as a cutting-edge approach in cancer immunotherapy. NKCEs offer a significant advancement over conventional monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) by enhancing Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC). They achieve this by stably and selectively binding to both NK cell activating receptors and tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Unlike traditional mAbs, which depend on the relatively transient interaction between their Fc region and CD16a, NKCEs establish more robust connections with a range of activating receptors (e.g., CD16a, NKG2D, NKp30, NKp46, NKG2C) and inhibitory receptors (e.g., Siglec-7) on NK cells, thereby increasing cancer cell killing efficacy and specificity. This review article critically examines the strategies for engineering bi-, tri-, and multi-specific NKCEs for cancer immunotherapy, providing an in-depth analysis of the latest advancements in NKCE platform technologies currently under development by pharmaceutical and biotech companies and discussing the preclinical and clinical progress of these products. While NKCEs show great promise, the review underscores the need for continued research to optimize their therapeutic efficacy and to overcome obstacles related to NK cell functionality in cancer patients. Ultimately, this article presents an overview of the current landscape and future prospects of NKCE-based cancer immunotherapy, emphasizing its potential to revolutionize cancer treatment.

Indexed as

bispecific trispecific multispecific antibodiescancer immunotherapyCD16a NKG2D NKG2C NKp30 NKp46natural killer cells (NK cells)NK activating receptorsNKCE platform technologies

Identifiers

PMID39911822
PMCPMC11794116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.