Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39911814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Closing the loop: establishing an autonomous test-learn cycle to optimize induction of bacterial systems using a robotic platform.

Jan Benedict Spannenkrebs, Aron Eiermann, Thomas Zoll, Silke Hackenschmidt, Johannes Kabisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan Benedict SpannenkrebsInstitute for Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Aron EiermannProteineer GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Thomas ZollComputer-Aided Synthetic Biology, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Silke HackenschmidtComputer-Aided Synthetic Biology, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Johannes KabischInstitute for Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One goal of synthetic biology is to provide well-characterised biological parts that behave predictably in genetic assemblies. To achieve this, each part must be characterised in a time-resolved manner under relevant conditions. Robotic platforms can be used to automate this task and provide sufficiently large and reproducible data sets including provenance. Although robotics can significantly speed up the data collection process, the collation and analysis of the resulting data, needed to reprogram and refine workflows for future iterations, is often a manual process. As a result, even in times of rapidly advancing artificial intelligence, the common design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle is still not circular without human intervention. To move towards fully automated DBTL cycles, we developed a software framework to enable a robotic platform to autonomously adjust test parameters. This interdisciplinary work between computer science and biology thus transforms a static robotic platform into a dynamic one. The software framework includes software components such as an importer that retrieves measurement data from the platform's devices and writes it to a database. This is followed by an optimizer that selects the next measurement points based on a balance between exploration and exploitation. The platform is shown to be able to automatically and autonomously optimize the inducer concentration for a

Indexed as

automationautonomous systemdesign-build-test-learn (DBTL) cyclelearning algorithmsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID39911814
PMCPMC11795046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.